We were almost there. The legislative initiative was the important ones, which allows consumers to significantly make a conscious decision to buy. It seems, unfortunately, time is not ripe and the Parliament has rejected a number of measures are very interesting. Many talented bloggers ( Dr. Gianna , Gunther ) wrote about this legislative initiative much more clearly than most renowned news agencies .
then I refer you to them to inform themselves fully on the EU legislation.
However, the most significant points of the proposed legislation are:
- indication, via a "traffic light" values \u200b\u200bsuch as "energy", "fat" and "sugar";
- indication, fat trans if any, and whether natural or artificial nutrition info
- always and only the 100 mg dose levels, not specified by the in modo che il consumatore possa fare una più semplice comparazione fra prodotti;
- specificare eventuali presenze di nanotecnologie.
Ci tengo ad evidenziare ulteriormente una cosa: non sarà fuorilegge nessun prodotto . Piuttosto, grazie ad una maggior chiarezza fin dalle informazioni nutrizionali, non ci sarà più possibilità di fare comunicazione di marketing ingannevole , o giù di lì. Ovvero n on possiamo dire che un prodotto è "genuino" e "non dovrebbe mai mancare in una sana e corretta alimentazione" se poi trionfa in grassi idrogenati ed è ipercalorico .
La rigidità e le forti pressioni delle grandi industrie sui MEPs and do not leave a clear aversion to imagine a transparent system: something to hide?
Those who make a quality product, in my opinion should not shake the contrary.
Greater transparency in the label can only be beneficial for these companies making it immediately obvious to consumers, the policies of product differentiation (in terms of higher quality). In other words, the buyer can more easily see who cares about his health and who, in the name of profit, the health of the people we think very little.
0 comments:
Post a Comment